Read this, Boris/Dominic.
Hey! Ron DeSantis!! WE TOLD YOU SO.
Yes, we told you before you did it that this would be the result. By “we” I mean the worldwide community of scientists, especially the experts in the fields of epidemiology and medicine, especially the ones who work in the field at places like CDC and Johns Hopkins, especially the nation’s leaders (like Anthony Fauci) and the people who work for your own state’s department of health.
We told you so, you ignored the warnings, went ahead with your re-opening plans, and the result was this:
It vaguely resembles a “hockey stick.”
View original post 31 more words
Open minds: excellent again.
Johnson/Cummings do note this.
I shouldn’t have to say it. But I do.
Nuclear reactors can use “control rods” to control the reaction. Push them in all the way, they’ll slow the reaction so much it will quickly die out. Pull them all the way out, the reaction grows so fast it goes critical — but before it can “go nuke” it melts. Still a disaster.
The “basic” epidemiological model (the SIR model) makes some very basic assumptions, and treats the spread of a disease like COVID-19 in a straightforward manner. It gives rise to the “bell-shaped” curve (the one everyone wants to flatten) we’ve seen in so many news stories.
Of course it’s not “right” — there are too many unaccounted-for factors to believe that. But they also encompass certain purely logical ideas which are known to be correct. Added bonus: the equations are not unlike what you see when you study…
View original post 695 more words
The OpenMind blog gives some support to the idea that Arctic weather is escaping to bother us with dangerous colds spells. Looks like Jennifer Francis is right. See Why Climate Change is Bringing the Polar Vortex South
So said Australian Member of Parliament David Shoebridge after bureaucrats attending a climate planning and adaptation conference had been advised not to discuss the relationship between climate change and Australia’s bushfire crisis, the Guardian reports.
Yes, there’s more news of wildfires on the rampage, bringing fear and destruction, made worse by many things including climate change. But the latest isn’t from California; it’s happening in Australia and especially hard hit is the territory of New South Wales. Yes, a lot of things are making wildfire/bushfire worse in California/Australia. Nobody denies that. One of those things is climate change. Those who deny that, are climate deniers.
View original post 286 more words
We need your help! Share your views on climate change with us.
Please share your views on climate change and reading blogs by filling out this survey. The data will be used for getting to know the readers of climate change blogs.
What’s in it for you?
• You have a chance on winning a $20 gift card of Amazon;
• You will get a sneak preview of the preliminary results;
• You will contribute to research on climate change blogs.
Participation is anonymous, and your answers will be handled confidentially. The data is only used for research purposes.
Your input is highly valued! Please fill out the survey by following this link.
The survey is developed by researchers of Cambridge and Wageningen University.
This is my comment on an interesting post by Tara Garnet on her FRCN blog, Has veganism become a dirty word? There are different views on the effects of methane on climate.
Comment on ‘Has veganism become a dirty word?’ by Geoff Beacon
Actually, methane’s not the problem we thought it was; methane’s temporary, actually methane’s natural.
Tara, this seems to be the view of Myles Allen and Richard Millar of your Oxford Martin School. As I understand it, their picture is this:
Emissions of methane heat the Earth’s surface for a decade or so before decaying. The rise in the Earth’s temperature causes net heat emissions to space. The long term effect on temperature is small. If keeping Earth’s temperature below a certain threshold is a target, then unless the target is likely in the next decade or so the temporary rise in surface temperature is not important.
There are others that disagree. Continue reading How bad is beef for the climate?
(York Plotlands Association is now defunct)
There are few (if any) examples of lifestyles in Britain which are sustainable. For example, at the new ‘sustainable’ development at Derwenthorpe, York, the carbon footprints of the residents are several times greater than the footprint necessary to avoid dangerous climate change. The York Plotlands Association promotes action and research into achieving lifestyles that are more sustainable.
(York Plotlands Association is now defunct.)
“Home buyers are forced into unaffordable, car based lifestyles.”
A plot of land big enough for a house costs roughly £500 at agricultural prices. In the York area, for example, a plot’s value becomes £50,000 once the planners’ give building the go ahead. There is no difference in the land: just its name on a certificate in a council office. This is an unearned bonus to the land owner, which starts the process of building expensive dwellings designed for unsustainable lifestyles.
More often than not, new houses are built with little regard to public transport links or cycle routes to town and with little in the way of local facilities, such as corner shops or local greengrocers, home buyers are forced into un-affordable, car based lifestyles.